I read with interest the paper by
Tibbo et al 1998
“Corpus Callosum Shape and Size in Male Patients with Schizophrenia,” in which they
report no difference in corpus callosum shape between patients and normal controls.
The methodology of the study is seriously flawed, rendering any conclusions regarding
landmark data invalid.To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Biological PsychiatryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data. Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge1991
- Combining the tools of geometric morphometrics.in: Marcus L. Corti M. Loy A. Naylor G. Slice D. Advances in Morphometrics Proceedings of the 193 NATO Advanced Study Institute on Morphometrics. Plenum, New York1996
- Landmark methods for forms without landmarks.Med Image Anal. 1997; 1: 225-243
- Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape.J R Stat Soc. 1991; 53: 285-339
- Corpus callosum shape and size in male patients with schizophrenia.Biol Psychiatry. 1998; 44: 405-412
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 1999 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
