Advertisement
Archival Report|Articles in Press

The impact of Mmu17 non-Hsa21 orthologous genes in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome: the “gold standard” refuted

  • Faycal Guedj
    Affiliations
    Prenatal Genomics and Fetal Therapy (PGT) Section, Center for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
    Search for articles by this author
  • Elise Kane
    Affiliations
    Prenatal Genomics and Fetal Therapy (PGT) Section, Center for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
    Search for articles by this author
  • Lauren A. Bishop
    Affiliations
    Prenatal Genomics and Fetal Therapy (PGT) Section, Center for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jeroen L.A. Pennings
    Affiliations
    Center for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author
  • Yann Herault
    Affiliations
    Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, INSERM, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire (IGBMC), Department of Translational Medicine and Neurogenetics, Strasbourg, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Diana W. Bianchi
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author: Diana W. Bianchi, MD, , Phone: (+1) 301-655-2890
    Affiliations
    Prenatal Genomics and Fetal Therapy (PGT) Section, Center for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States

    Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Background

      Despite successful preclinical treatment studies to improve neurocognition in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome, translation to humans has failed. This raises questions about the appropriateness of the Ts65Dn mouse as the “gold standard.” We used the novel Ts66Yah mouse that carries an extra chromosome and the identical segmental Mmu16 trisomy as Ts65Dn without the Mmu17 non-orthologous region.

      Methods

      Forebrains from embryonic day 18.5 Ts66Yah and Ts65Dn mice, along with euploid littermate controls, were used for gene expression and pathway analyses. Behavioral experiments were performed in neonatal and adult mice. Since male Ts66Yah mice are fertile, parent of origin transmission of the extra chromosome was studied.

      Results

      Forty-five protein coding genes mapped to the Ts65Dn Mmu17 non-orthologous region; 71-82% are expressed during forebrain development. Several of these genes are uniquely overexpressed in Ts65Dn embryonic forebrain producing major differences in dysregulated genes and pathways. Despite these differences, the primary Mmu16 trisomic effects were highly conserved in both models, resulting in commonly dysregulated disomic genes and pathways. Delays in motor development, communication and olfactory spatial memory were present in Ts66Yah but more pronounced in Ts65Dn neonates. Adult Ts66Yah mice showed milder working memory deficits and sex-specific effects in exploratory behavior and spatial hippocampal memory, while long-term memory was preserved.

      Conclusions

      Our findings suggest that triplication of the non-orthologous Mmu17 genes significantly contributes to the phenotype of the Ts65Dn mouse and may explain why preclinical trials that used this model have unsuccessfully translated to human therapies.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Biological Psychiatry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Davisson MT
        • Schmidt C
        • Akeson EC
        Segmental trisomy of murine chromosome 16: a new model system for studying Down syndrome.
        Prog Clin Biol Res. 1990; 360 (PMID 2147289): 263-280
        • Davisson MT
        • Schmidt C
        • Reeves RH
        • Irving NG
        • Akeson EC
        • Harris BS
        • Bronson RT
        Segmental trisomy as a mouse model for Down syndrome.
        Prog Clin Biol Res. 1993; 384 (PMID 8115398): 117-133
        • Muniz Moreno MDM
        • Brault V
        • Birling MC
        • Pavlovic G
        • Herault Y
        Modeling Down syndrome in animals from the early stage to the 4.0 models and next.
        Prog Brain Res. 2020; 251 (PMID 32057313): 91-143https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.08.001
        • Tosh J
        • Tybulewicz V
        • Fisher EMC
        Mouse models of aneuploidy to understand chromosome disorders.
        Mamm Genome. 2022; 33 (PMID 34719726): 157-168https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-021-09930-z
        • Herault Y
        • Delabar JM
        • Fisher EMC
        • Tybulewicz VLJ
        • Yu E
        • Brault V
        Rodent models in Down syndrome research: impact and future opportunities.
        Dis Model Mech. 2017; 10 (PMID 28993310): 1165-1186https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.029728
        • Lee SE
        • Duran-Martinez M
        • Khantsis S
        • Bianchi DW
        • Guedj F
        Challenges and opportunities for translation of therapies to improve cognition in Down syndrome.
        Trends Mol Med. 2020; 26 (PMID 31706840): 150-169https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2019.10.001
        • Rueda N
        • Florez J
        • Dierssen M
        • Martinez-Cue C
        Translational validity and implications of pharmacotherapies in preclinical models of Down syndrome.
        Prog Brain Res. 2020; 251 (PMID 32057309): 245-268https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.10.001
        • Reinholdt LG
        • Ding Y
        • Gilbert GJ
        • Czechanski A
        • Solzak JP
        • Roper RJ
        • et al.
        Molecular characterization of the translocation breakpoints in the Down syndrome mouse model Ts65Dn.
        Mamm Genome. 2011; 22 (PMID 21953412): 685-691https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-011-9357-z
        • Duchon A
        • Raveau M
        • Chevalier C
        • Nalesso V
        • Sharp AJ
        • Herault Y
        Identification of the translocation breakpoints in the Ts65Dn and Ts1Cje mouse lines: relevance for modeling Down syndrome.
        Mamm Genome. 2011; 22 (PMID 21953411): 674-684https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-011-9356-0
      1. Duchon A, del Mar Muniz Moreno M, Chevalier C, Nalesso V, Andre P, Fructuoso-Castellar M, et al. (2022) : Ts66Yah, an upgraded Ts65Dn mouse model, for Down syndrome for the only region homologous to human chromosome 21. Dis Model Mech 14:dmm.049721. doi: 10.1242/dmm.049721. PMID 36374158.

        • Hoelter SM
        • Dalke C
        • Kallnik M
        • Becker L
        • Horsch M
        • Schrewe A
        • et al.
        Sighted C3H" mice--a tool for analysing the influence of vision on mouse behaviour?.
        Front Biosci. 2008; 13 (PMID 18508624): 5810-5823https://doi.org/10.2741/3118
        • Roper RJ
        • St John HK
        • Philip J
        • Lawler A
        • Reeves RH
        Perinatal loss of Ts65Dn Down syndrome mice.
        Genetics. 2006; 172 (PMID 16172497): 437-443https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.050898
        • Villar AJ
        • Belichenko PV
        • Gillespie AM
        • Kozy HM
        • Mobley WC
        • Epstein CJ
        Identification and characterization of a new Down syndrome model, Ts[Rb(12.1716)]2Cje, resulting from a spontaneous Robertsonian fusion between T(171)65Dn and mouse chromosome 12.
        Mamm Genome. 2005; 16 (PMID 15859352): 79-90https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-004-2428-7
        • Aziz NM
        • Guedj F
        • Pennings JLA
        • Olmos-Serrano JL
        • Siegel A
        • Haydar TF
        • Bianchi DW
        Lifespan analysis of brain development, gene expression and behavioral phenotypes in the Ts1Cje, Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1/Yey mouse models of Down syndrome.
        Dis Model Mech. 2018; 11 (PMID 29716957)https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.031013
        • Guedj F
        • Pennings JL
        • Ferres MA
        • Graham LC
        • Wick HC
        • Miczek KA
        • et al.
        The fetal brain transcriptome and neonatal behavioral phenotype in the Ts1Cje mouse model of Down syndrome.
        Am J Med Genet A. 2015; 167A (PMID 25975229): 1993-2008https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.37156
        • Olmos-Serrano JL
        • Tyler WA
        • Cabral HJ
        • Haydar TF
        Longitudinal measures of cognition in the Ts65Dn mouse: Refining windows and defining modalities for therapeutic intervention in Down syndrome.
        Exp Neurol. 2016; 279 (PMID 26854932): 40-56https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.02.005
        • Faizi M
        • Bader PL
        • Tun C
        • Encarnacion A
        • Kleschevnikov A
        • Belichenko P
        • et al.
        Comprehensive behavioral phenotyping of Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome: activation of beta1-adrenergic receptor by xamoterol as a potential cognitive enhancer.
        Neurobiol. 2011; Dis43 (PMID 21527343): 397-413https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2011.04.011
        • Gupta M
        • Dhanasekaran AR
        • Gardiner KJ
        Mouse models of Down syndrome: gene content and consequences.
        Mamm Genome. 2016; 27 (PMID 27538963): 538-555https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-016-9661-8
        • Guedj F
        • Bianchi DW
        • Delabar JM
        Prenatal treatment of Down syndrome: a reality?.
        Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 26 (PMID 24573065): 92-103https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000056
        • Akeson EC
        • Lambert JP
        • Narayanswami S
        • Gardiner K
        • Bechtel LJ
        • Davisson MT
        Ts65Dn -- localization of the translocation breakpoint and trisomic gene content in a mouse model for Down syndrome.
        Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2001; 93 (PMID 11528125): 270-276https://doi.org/10.1159/000056997
        • Moffat JJ
        • Jung EM
        • Ka M
        • Smith AL
        • Jeon BT
        • Santen GWE
        • Kim W-Y
        The role of ARID1B, a BAF chromatin remodeling complex subunit, in neural development and behavior.
        Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019; 89 (PMID 30149092): 30-38https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.08.021
        • Sim JC
        • White SM
        • Lockhart PJ
        ARID1B-mediated disorders: Mutations and possible mechanisms.
        Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2015; 4 (PMID 25674384): 17-23https://doi.org/10.5582/irdr.2014.01021
        • Moffat JJ
        • Smith AL
        • Jung EM
        • Ka M
        • Kim WY
        Neurobiology of ARID1B haploinsufficiency related to neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders.
        Mol Psychiatry. 2022; 27 (PMID 33686214): 476-489https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01060-x
        • Diggle CP
        • Sukoff Rizzo SJ
        • Popiolek M
        • Hinttala R
        • Schulke J-P
        • Kurian MA
        • et al.
        Biallelic mutations in PDE10A lead to loss of striatal PDE10A and a hyperkinetic movement disorder with onset in infancy.
        Am J Hum Genet. 2016; 98 (PMID 27058446): 735-743https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.015
        • Fujishige K
        • Kotera J
        • Yuasa K
        • Omori K
        The human phosphodiesterase PDE10A gene genomic organization and evolutionary relatedness with other PDEs containing GAF domains.
        Eur J Biochem. 2000; 267 (PMID 10998054): 5943-5951https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01661.x
        • Mencacci NE
        • Kamsteeg EJ
        • Nakashima K
        • R’Bibo
        • Lynch DS
        • Balint B
        • et al.
        De novo mutations in PDE10A cause childhood-onset chorea with bilateral striatal lesions.
        Am J Hum Genet. 2016; 98 (PMID 27058447): 763-771https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.02.015
        • Siuciak JA
        • McCarthy SA
        • Chapin DS
        • Martin AN
        • Harms JF
        • Schmidt CJ
        Behavioral characterization of mice deficient in the phosphodiesterase-10A (PDE10A) enzyme on a C57/Bl6N congenic background.
        Neuropharmacology. 2008; 54 (PMID 18061215): 417-427https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2007.10.009
        • Liu Z
        • Xu D
        • Zhao Y
        • Zheng J
        Non-syndromic mild mental retardation candidate gene CDKL3 regulates neuronal morphogenesis.
        Neurobiol Dis. 2010; 39 (PMID 20347982): 242-251https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2010.03.015
        • Liu Z
        • Tao D
        Inactivition of CDKL3 mildly inhibits proliferation of cells at VZ/SVZ in brain.
        Neurol Sci. 2015; 36 (PMID 25270654): 297-302https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-014-1952-9
        • Pilotte J
        • Cunningham BA
        • Edelman GM
        • Vanderklish PW
        Developmentally regulated expression of the cold-inducible RNA-binding motif protein 3 in euthermic rat brain.
        Brain Res. 2009; 1258 (PMID 19150436): 12-24https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.12.050
        • Jackson TC
        • Kotermanski SE
        • Kochanek PM
        Infants uniquely express high levels of RBM3 and other cold-adaptive neuroprotectant proteins in the human brain.
        Dev Neurosci. 2018; 40 (PMID 30399610): 325-336https://doi.org/10.1159/000493637
        • Yan J
        • Goerne T
        • Zelmer A
        • Guzman R
        • Kapfhammer JP
        • Wellmann S
        • Zhu X
        The RNA-binding protein RBM3 promotes neural stem cell (NSC) proliferation under hypoxia.
        Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019; 7 (PMID 31824945): 288https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2019.00288
        • Sago H
        • Carlson EJ
        • Smith DJ
        • Rubin EM
        • Crnic LS
        • Huang TT
        • Epstein CJ
        Genetic dissection of region associated with behavioral abnormalities in mouse models for Down syndrome.
        Pediatr Res. 2000; 48 (PMID 11044479): 606-613https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-200011000-00009
        • Shaw PR
        • Klein JA
        • Aziz NM
        • Haydar TF
        Longitudinal neuroanatomical and behavioral analyses show phenotypic drift and variability in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome.
        Dis Model Mech. 2020; 13 (PMID 32817053)https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.046243
        • Coussons-Read ME
        • Crnic LS
        Behavioral assessment of the Ts65Dn mouse, a model for Down syndrome: altered behavior in the elevated plus maze and open field.
        Behav Genet. 1996; 26 (PMID 8852727): 7-13https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02361154
      2. Manfredi-Lozano M, Leysen V, Adamo M, Paiva I, Rivera R, Pignat J-M, et al. (2022): GnRH replacement rescues cognition in Down syndrome. Science Sep 2; 377(6610):eabq4515. Doi: 10.1126/science.abq4515. PMID 36048943.