The decision by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to create a new institute organized around the science of addiction, called the National Institute on Substance Use and Addiction Disorders (NISUAD), continues to elicit considerable debate within the scientific and public advocacy communities. NISUAD would be created largely from the portfolios of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), both of which would cease to exist. However, as part of this reorganization, a major focus of current discussion, and ongoing controversy, is what pieces of these two institutes should be transferred to other institutes/centers of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and what from these other institutes/centers should be housed within NISUAD?
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Biological Psychiatry
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Published online: June 11, 2012
Accepted: May 15, 2012
Received: April 24, 2012
© 2012 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.