Advertisement
Archival Report| Volume 70, ISSUE 4, P366-372, August 15, 2011

Download started.

Ok

Mood-Linked Responses in Medial Prefrontal Cortex Predict Relapse in Patients with Recurrent Unipolar Depression

      Background

      Altered cognitive processing following mood challenge is associated with elevated relapse risk in remitted unipolar depressed patients, but little is known about the neural basis of this reactivity and its link to depressive relapse and prophylaxis.

      Methods

      Remitted unipolar depressed participants (n = 16) and healthy control subjects (n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while viewing sad and neutral film clips. Correlations were determined between emotional reactivity (neural responses to sad vs. neutral films) in remitted patients and subsequent relapse status over an 18 month follow-up period. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine signal cutoffs for predicting relapse. Emotional reactivity in relapse prognostic areas was compared between groups.

      Results

      Within the remitted group, relapse was predicted by medial prefrontal cortical (mPFC; Brodmann's area 32) activity and contraindicated by visual cortical activity (Brodmann's area 17). mPFC reactivity predicted rumination, whereas visual cortical reactivity predicted distress tolerance (acceptance). Compared with control participants, remitted depressed patients demonstrated a more pronounced tradeoff between mPFC and visual cortex reactivity. The difference score between mPFC and visual reactivity yielded excellent prediction of depressive relapse.

      Conclusions

      Medial prefrontal cortical reactivity to mood provocation in remitted unipolar depressed patients serves as a marker of relapse risk rather than successful emotion regulation. Enduring remission is characterized by normalization of the mPFC to that of healthy control subjects. Furthermore, visual cortex reactivity predicts resilience against depressive relapse, indicating a prophylactic role for sensory rather than ruminative cognitive reactivity in the processing of negative emotion.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Biological Psychiatry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rush A.J.
        • Trivedi M.H.
        • Wisniewski S.R.
        • Nierenberg A.A.
        • Stewart J.W.
        • Warden D.
        • et al.
        Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: A STAR*D report.
        Am J Psychiatry. 2006; 163: 1905-1917
        • Greenberg P.E.
        • Kessler R.C.
        • Birnbaum H.G.
        • Leong S.A.
        • Lowe S.W.
        • Berglund P.A.
        • et al.
        The economic burden of depression in the United States: How did it change between 1990 and 2000?.
        J Clin Psychiatry. 2003; 64: 1465-1475
        • Segal Z.V.
        • Kennedy S.
        • Gemar M.
        • Hood K.
        • Pedersen R.
        • Buis T.
        Cognitive reactivity to sad mood provocation and the prediction of depressive relapse.
        Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006; 63: 750-755
        • Antypa N.
        • Van der Does A.J.
        Serotonin transporter gene, childhood emotional abuse and cognitive vulnerability to depression.
        Genes Brain Behav. 2010; 9: 615-620
        • Koenigs M.
        • Grafman J.
        The functional neuroanatomy of depression: Distinct roles for ventromedial and dosrolateral prefrontal cortex.
        Behav Brain Res. 2009; 201: 239-243
        • Gotlib I.H.
        • Hamilton J.P.
        Neuroimaging and depression: Current status and unresolved issues.
        Curr Directions Psychol Sci. 2008; 17: 159-163
        • Siegle G.J.
        • Carter C.S.
        • Thase M.E.
        Use of fMRI to predict recovery from unipolar depression with cognitive behavior therapy.
        Am J Psychiatry. 2006; 163: 735-738
        • Lemogne C.
        • Mayberg H.
        • Bergouignan L.
        • Volle E.
        • Delaveau P.
        • Lehéricy S.
        • et al.
        Self-referential processing and the prefrontal cortex over the course of depression: A pilot study.
        J Affect Disord. 2010; 124: 196-201
        • Heller A.S.
        • Johnstone T.
        • Shackman A.J.
        • Light S.N.
        • Peterson M.J.
        • Kolden G.G.
        • et al.
        Reduced capacity to sustain positive emotion in major depression reflect diminished maintenance of fronto-striatal brain activation.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106: 22445-22450
        • Johnstone T.
        • van Reekum C.M.
        • Urry H.L.
        • Kalin N.H.
        • Davidson R.J.
        Failure to regulate: Counterproductive recruitment of top-down prefrontal-subcortical circuitry in major depression.
        J Neurosci. 2007; 27: 8877-8884
      1. Bond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N, Orcutt HK, et al. (in press). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionniare - II: A revised measure of psychological flexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy.

        • Nolen-Hoeksema S.
        • Morrow J.
        A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake.
        J Personal Soc Psychol. 1991; 61: 115-121
        • Hamilton M.
        A rating scale for depression.
        J Neurol Neurosurg, Psychiatry. 1960; 23: 56-62
        • Segal Z.V.
        • Bieling P.
        • Young T.
        • MacQueen G.
        • Cooke R.
        • Martin L.
        • et al.
        Antidepressant monotherapy vs sequential pharmacotherapy and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, or placebo, for relapse prophylaxis in recurrent depression.
        Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010; 67: 1256-1264
        • Macey P.M.
        • Macey K.E.
        • Kumar R.
        • Harper R.M.
        A method for removal of global effects from fMRI time series.
        Neuroimage. 2004; 22: 360-366
        • Genovese C.R.
        • Lazar N.A.
        • Nichols T.
        Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate.
        Neuroimage. 2002; 15: 870-878
        • Poldrack R.
        • Mumford J.
        Independence in ROI analysis: Where is the voodoo?.
        Soc Cognit Affect Neuroscience. 2009; 4: 208-213
        • MacKinnon D.P.
        • Fairchild A.J.
        • Fritz M.S.
        Mediation analysis.
        Annu Review Psychol. 2007; 58: 593-614
        • Pizzagalli D.A.
        Frontocingulate dysfunction in depression: Toward biomarkers of treatment response.
        Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011; 36: 183-206
        • Keedwell P.A.
        • Drapier D.
        • Surguladze S.
        • Giampietro V.
        • Brammer M.
        • Phillips M.
        • et al.
        Subgenual cingulate and visual cortex responses to sad faces predict clinical outcome during antidepressant treatment for depression.
        J Affect Disord. 2010; 120: 120-125
        • Farb N.A.S.
        • Anderson A.K.
        • Mayberg H.S.
        • Bean J.
        • McKeon D.
        • Segal Z.V.
        • et al.
        Minding one's emotions: Mindfulness training alters the neural expression of sadness.
        Emotion. 2010; 10: 25-33
        • Fresco D.
        • Segal Z.V.
        • Buis T.
        • Kennedy S.
        Relationship of Posttreatment Decentering and Cognitive Reactivity to Relapse in Major Depression.
        J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007; 75: 447-455
        • Lau M.A.
        • Segal Z.V.
        • Williams J.M.G.
        Teasdale's differential activation hypothesis: Implications for mechanisms of depressive relapse and suicidal behaviour.
        Behav Res Ther. 2004; 42: 1001-1017
        • Creswell J.
        • Way B.
        • Eisenberger N.
        • Lieberman M.
        Neural correlates of dispositional mindfulness during affect labeling.
        Psychosom Med. 2007; 69: 560-565
        • Jackson P.L.
        • Brunet E.
        • Meltzoff A.N.
        • Decety J.
        Empathy examined through the neural mechanisms involved in imagining how I feel versus how you feel pain.
        Neuropsychologia. 2006; 44: 752-761
        • Ochsner K.N.
        • Hughes B.
        • Robertson E.R.
        • Cooper J.C.
        • Gabrieli J.D.E.
        Neural systems supporting the control of affective and cognitive conflicts.
        J Cogn Neurosci. 2009; 9: 1841-1854
        • Piech R.M.
        • Lewis J.
        • Parkinson C.H.
        • Owen A.R.
        • Roberts A.C.
        • Downing P.E.
        • Parkinson J.A.
        • et al.
        Neural correlates of affective influence on choice.
        Brain Cogn. 2010; 72: 282-288
        • Surguladze S.
        • Brammer M.J.
        • Keedwell P.
        • Giampietro V.
        • Young A.W.
        • Travis M.J.
        • et al.
        A differential pattern of neural response toward sad versus happy facial expressions in major depressive disorder.
        Biol Psychiatry. 2005; 57: 201-209