Advertisement

Hypersensitivity to Reward in Problem Gamblers

Published:December 31, 2009DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.11.009

      Background

      Recent research has begun to examine the neurophysiologic basis of pathological gambling. However, direct evidence of a behavioral deficit and an accompanying neurofunctional deviation in a realistic gambling context such as Black Jack has not yet been reported.

      Methods

      Electroencephalogram was recorded while 20 problem gamblers and 21 control participants played a computerized version of Black Jack. Participants were asked to decide at point scores between 11 and 21 whether they wanted to take another card (“hit”) to arrive closer to 21 than the opponent (simulated by computer) or not to take another card (“sit”) to avoid going over 21 (“bust”).

      Results

      At a critical point score of 16, problem gamblers decided more often to hit despite losses due to a bust on the preceding trial, whereas control participants decided more often to sit under these conditions. Furthermore, problem gamblers showed more reward-related positive amplitudes in the event-related brain potential than control participants after successful hit decisions at 16.

      Conclusions

      Here we provide experimental evidence for high-risk taking behavior in gamblers and its correlate in event-related brain potentials. Our results suggest that high-risk-taking behavior in problem gamblers is associated with an increased reward-related neural response to infrequent successes of this behavior.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Biological Psychiatry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Blum K.
        • Sheridan P.J.
        • Wood R.C.
        • Braverman E.R.
        • Chen T.J.
        • Comings D.E.
        Dopamine D2 receptor gene variants: Association and linkage studies in impulsive-addictive-compulsive behaviour.
        Pharmacogenetics. 1995; 5: 121-141
        • Comings D.E.
        • Rosenthal R.J.
        • Lesieur H.R.
        • Rugle L.J.
        • Muhleman D.
        • Chiu C.
        • et al.
        A study of the dopamine D2 receptor gene in pathological gambling.
        Pharmacogenetics. 1996; 6: 223-234
        • Reuter J.
        • Raedler T.
        • Rose M.
        • Hand I.
        • Glascher J.
        • Buchel C.
        Pathological gambling is linked to reduced activation of the mesolimbic reward system.
        Nat Neurosci. 2005; 8: 147-148
        • Klein T.A.
        • Neumann J.
        • Reuter M.
        • Hennig J.
        • von Cramon D.Y.
        • Ullsperger M.
        Genetically determined differences in learning from errors.
        Science. 2007; 318: 1642-1645
        • Potenza M.N.
        • Leung H.C.
        • Blumberg H.P.
        • Peterson B.S.
        • Fulbright R.K.
        • Lacadie C.M.
        • et al.
        An FMRI Stroop task study of ventromedial prefrontal cortical function in pathological gamblers.
        Am J Psychiatry. 2003; 160: 1990-1994
        • Holroyd C.B.
        • Coles M.G.H.
        The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity.
        Psychol Review. 2002; 109: 679-709
        • Schultz W.
        • Dayan P.
        • Montague P.R.
        A neural substrate of prediction and reward.
        Science. 1997; 275: 1593-1599
        • Miltner W.H.R.
        • Braun C.H.
        • Coles M.G.H.
        Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: Evidence for a “generic” neural system for error detection.
        J Cogn Neurosci. 1997; 9: 788-798
        • Holroyd C.B.
        • Nieuwenhuis S.
        • Yeung N.
        • Nystrom L.
        • Mars R.B.
        • Coles M.G.
        • et al.
        Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex shows fMRI response to internal and external error signals.
        Nat Neurosci. 2004; 7: 497-498
        • Potts G.F.
        • Martin L.E.
        • Burton P.
        • Montague P.R.
        When things are better or worse than expected: The medial frontal cortex and the allocation of processing resources.
        J Cogn Neurosci. 2006; 18: 1112-1119
        • Holroyd C.B.
        • Pakzad-Vaezi K.L.
        • Krigolson O.E.
        The feedback correct-related positivity: Sensitivity of the event-related brain potential to unexpected positive feedback.
        Psychophysiology. 2008; 45: 688-697
        • Hewig J.
        • Straube T.
        • Trippe R.H.
        • Hecht H.
        • Kretschmer N.
        • Coles M.G.H.
        • et al.
        Decision-making under risk: An fMRI study.
        J Cogn Neurosci. 2009; 21: 1642-1652
        • Hewig J.
        • Trippe R.H.
        • Hecht H.
        • Coles M.G.H.
        • Holroyd C.B.
        • Miltner W.H.R.
        Decision-making in Black Jack: An electrophysiological analysis.
        Cereb Cortex. 2007; 17: 865-877
        • Petry J.
        Psychotherapie der Glücksspielsucht.
        Beltz/Psychologie Verlags Union, Weinheim1996
        • Lesieur H.R.
        • Blume S.B.
        The South Oaks gambling screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers.
        Am J Psychiatry. 1987; 144: 1184-1188
        • Jocham G.
        • Ullsperger M.
        Neuropharmacology of performance monitoring.
        Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009; 33: 48-60
        • Sutton R.S.
        • Barto A.G.
        Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction.
        MIT Press, Cambridge, MA1998
        • Bechara A.
        Risky business: Emotion, decision-making, and addiction.
        J Gambl Stud. 2003; 19: 23-51
        • Comings D.E.
        • Gonzalez N.
        • Wu S.
        • Gade R.
        • Muhleman D.
        • Saucier G.
        • et al.
        Studies of the 48 bp repeat polymorphism of the DRD4 gene in impulsive, compulsive, addictive behaviors: Tourette syndrome, ADHD, pathological gambling, and substance abuse.
        Am J Med Genet. 1999; 88: 358-368
        • Hollander E.
        • Buchalter A.J.
        • DeCaria C.M.
        Pathological gambling.
        Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2000; 23: 629-642