Advertisement
Techniques and methods| Volume 56, ISSUE 8, P607-610, October 15, 2004

Experience-dependent plasticity for attention to threat: Behavioral and neurophysiological evidence in humans

  • Christopher S. Monk
    Correspondence
    Address reprint requests to Christopher S. Monk, Ph.D., 15K North Drive, Room 204, Bethesda, MD 20892-2670
    Affiliations
    National Institute of Mental Health (CSM, EEN, GW, LAM, EBM, AEG, EL, DSC, ME, DSP), National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
    Search for articles by this author
  • Eric E. Nelson
    Affiliations
    National Institute of Mental Health (CSM, EEN, GW, LAM, EBM, AEG, EL, DSC, ME, DSP), National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
    Search for articles by this author
  • Girma Woldehawariat
    Affiliations
    National Institute of Mental Health (CSM, EEN, GW, LAM, EBM, AEG, EL, DSC, ME, DSP), National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
    Search for articles by this author
  • Lee Anne Montgomery
    Affiliations
    National Institute of Mental Health (CSM, EEN, GW, LAM, EBM, AEG, EL, DSC, ME, DSP), National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
    Search for articles by this author
  • Eric Zarahn
    Affiliations
    Department of Psychiatry (EZ), Columbia University, New York, New York
    Search for articles by this author
  • Erin B. McClure
    Affiliations
    National Institute of Mental Health (CSM, EEN, GW, LAM, EBM, AEG, EL, DSC, ME, DSP), National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
    Search for articles by this author
  • Amanda E. Guyer
    Affiliations
    National Institute of Mental Health (CSM, EEN, GW, LAM, EBM, AEG, EL, DSC, ME, DSP), National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ellen Leibenluft
    Affiliations
    National Institute of Mental Health (CSM, EEN, GW, LAM, EBM, AEG, EL, DSC, ME, DSP), National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
    Search for articles by this author
  • Dennis S. Charney
    Affiliations
    National Institute of Mental Health (CSM, EEN, GW, LAM, EBM, AEG, EL, DSC, ME, DSP), National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
    Search for articles by this author
  • Monique Ernst
    Affiliations
    National Institute of Mental Health (CSM, EEN, GW, LAM, EBM, AEG, EL, DSC, ME, DSP), National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
    Search for articles by this author
  • Daniel S. Pine
    Affiliations
    National Institute of Mental Health (CSM, EEN, GW, LAM, EBM, AEG, EL, DSC, ME, DSP), National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
    Search for articles by this author
Published:September 21, 2004DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.07.012
      Biased attention to threat represents a key feature of anxiety disorders. This bias is altered by therapeutic or stressful experiences, suggesting that the bias is plastic. Charting on-line behavioral and neurophysiological changes in attention bias may generate insights on the nature of such plasticity. We used an attention-orientation task with threat cues to examine how healthy individuals alter their response over time to such cues. In Experiments 1 through 3, we established that healthy individuals demonstrate an increased attention bias away from threat over time. For Experiment 3, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to determine the neural bases for this phenomenon. Gradually increasing attention bias away from threat is associated with increased activation in the occipitotemporal cortex. Examination of plasticity of attention bias with individuals at risk for anxiety disorders may reveal how threatening stimuli come to be categorized differently in this population over time.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Biological Psychiatry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bradley B.P.
        • Mogg K.
        • White J.
        • Groom C.
        • de Bono J.
        Attentional bias for emotional faces in generalized anxiety disorder.
        Br J Clin Psychol. 1999; 38: 267-278
        • Draganski B.
        • Gaser C.
        • Busch V.
        • Schuierer G.
        • Bogdahn U.
        • May A.
        Neuroplasticity.
        Nature. 2004; 427: 311-312
        • Foa E.B.
        • McNally R.J.
        Sensitivity to feared stimuli in obsessive-compulsives.
        Cognit Ther Res. 1986; 10: 477-486
        • Fox E.
        • Russo R.
        • Bowles R.
        • Dutton K.
        Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?.
        J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001; 130: 681-700
        • Halligan S.L.
        • Michael T.
        • Clark D.M.
        • Ehlers A.
        Posttraumatic stress disorder following assault.
        J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003; 71: 419-431
        • Henson R.
        • Shallice T.
        • Dolan R.
        Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming.
        Science. 2000; 287: 1269-1272
        • Hitchcock J.
        • Davis M.
        Lesions of the amygdala, but not of the cerebellum or red nucleus, block conditioned fear as measured with the potentiated startle paradigm.
        Behav Neurosci. 1986; 100: 11-22
        • Kaufman J.
        • Birmaher B.
        • Brent D.
        • Rao V.
        • Flynn C.
        • Moreci P.
        • et al.
        Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children—present lifetime version (K-SADS-PL).
        J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997; 36
        • Lundqvist D.
        • Flykt A.
        • Vhman A.
        The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces. 1998 ([Pictorial face set available from Department of Neurosciences, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden].)
        • MacLeod C.
        • Mathews A.
        • Tata P.
        Attentional bias in emotional disorders.
        J Abnorm Psychol. 1986; 95: 15-20
        • MacLeod C.
        • Rutherford E.
        • Campbell L.
        • Ebsworthy G.
        • Holker L.
        Selective attention and emotional vulnerability.
        J Abnorm Psychol. 2002; 111: 107-123
        • Mathews A.
        • Mogg K.
        • Kentish J.
        • Eysenck M.
        Effect of psychological treatment on cognitive bias in generalized anxiety disorder.
        Behav Res Ther. 1995; 33: 293-303
        • Mogg K.
        • Bradley B.P.
        Selective orienting of attention to masked threat faces in social anxiety.
        Behav Res Ther. 2002; 40: 1403-1414
        • Monk C.S.
        • McClure E.B.
        • Nelson E.E.
        • Zarahn E.
        • Bilder R.M.
        • Liebenluft E.
        • et al.
        Adolescent immaturity in attention-related brain engagement to emotional facial expressions.
        Neuroimage. 2003; 20: 420-428
        • Olesen P.J.
        • Westerberg H.
        • Klingberg T.
        Increased prefrontal and parietal activity after training of working memory.
        Nat Neurosci. 2004; 7: 75-79
        • Pessoa L.
        • McKenna M.
        • Gutierrez E.
        • Ungerleider L.G.
        Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 11458-11463
        • Pine D.S.
        Developmental psychobiology and response to threats.
        Biol Psychiatry. 2003; 53: 796-808
        • Posner M.I.
        • Snyder C.R.
        • Davidson B.J.
        Attention and the detection of signals.
        J Exp Psychol. 1980; 109: 160-174
        • Spitzer R.L.
        • Williams J.B.
        • Gibbon M.
        • First M.G.
        The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). I: History, rationale, and description.
        Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992; 49: 624-629
        • Thiel C.M.
        • Henson R.N.
        • Morris J.S.
        • Friston K.J.
        • Dolan R.J.
        Pharmacological modulation of behavioral and neuronal correlates of repetition priming.
        J Neurosci. 2001; 21: 6846-6852
        • Wechsler D.
        Wechsler abbreviated scale intelligence. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX1999
        • Wolfinger R.
        An example of using mixed models and PROC MIXED for longitudinal data.
        J Biopharm Stat. 1997; 7: 481-500
        • Worsley K.J.
        • Marrett S.
        • Neelin P.
        • Vandal A.C.
        • Friston K.J.
        • Evans A.C.
        A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation.
        Hum Brain Mapp. 1996; 4: 58-73