Advertisement
Brief report| Volume 32, ISSUE 9, P839-841, November 01, 1992

Stimulus parameter effects on the P50 evoked response

  • George Zouridakis
    Affiliations
    From the Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA

    Department of Psychiatry, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Nashaat N. Boutros
    Correspondence
    Address reprint requests to Nashaat N. Boutros, M.D., Ohio State University, Department of Psychiatry, 473 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210.
    Affiliations
    From the Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA

    Department of Psychiatry, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
    Search for articles by this author
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3223(92)90088-H
Stimulus parameter effects on the P50 evoked response
Previous ArticleBupropion treatment of fluoxetine-resistant chronic fatigue syndrome
Next ArticleCounter clockwise scalp hair whorl in schizophrenia
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Biological Psychiatry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Register: Create an account
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Baker N.
        • Adler L.E.
        • Franks R.D.
        • et al.
        Neurophysiological assessment of sensory gating in psychiatric inpatients: Comparison between schizophrenia and other diagnosis.
        Biol Psychiatry. 1987; 22: 603-717
        • Boutros N.N.
        • Zouridakis G.
        • Overall J.
        Replication and extension of the P50 findings in schizophrenia.
        Clin Electroencephalogr. 1991; 22: 40-45
        • Boutros N.N.
        • Overall J.
        • Zouridakis G.
        Test-retest reliability of the P50 mid-latency auditory evoked response.
        Psychiatry Res. 1991; 39: 181-192
        • Buchwald J.S.
        • Rubinstein E.H.
        • Schwafel J.
        • Strandburg R.J.
        Midlatency auditory evoked responses: Differential effects of a cholinergic agonist and antagonist.
        Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991; 80: 303-309
        • Davis H.
        • Mast T.
        • Yoshie N.
        • Zerlin S.
        The slow response of the human cortex to auditory stimuli: Recovery cycle process.
        Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1966; 21: 105-113
        • Eccles J.C.
        The inhibitory Pathways of the Central Nervous System.
        University Press, Liverpool1969
        • Erwin R.J.
        • Buckwald J.S.
        Midlatency auditory evoked responses: Differential effects of sleep in the human.
        Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1986; 65: 383-392
        • Fruhstorfer H.
        • Soveri P.
        • Jarvilehto T.
        Short-term habituation of the auditory evoked response in man.
        Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1970; 28: 153-161
        • Jerger K.
        • Biggins C.
        • Fein G.
        P50 suppression is not affected by attentional manipulations.
        Biol Psychiatry. 1992; 31: 365-377
        • Nagamoto H.T.
        • Adler L.E.
        • Waldo M.A.
        • Freedman R.
        Sensory gating in schizophrenics and normal controls: Effects of changing stimulation interval.
        Biol Psychiatry. 1989; 25: 549-561

      Article info

      Publication history

      Received in revised form: July 10, 1992
      Received: April 23, 1992

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3223(92)90088-H

      Copyright

      © 1992 Published by Elsevier Inc.

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect
      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the for this site.
      Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties. The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      RELX