Biological Psychiatry
Volume 51, Issue 12 , Pages 988-994, 15 June 2002

Two models of impulsivity: relationship to personality traits and psychopathology

  • Alan C. Swann

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Alan C. Swann, M.D., University of Texas Medical School, Mental Sciences Institute, 1300 Moursund Street, Room 270, Houston TX 77030 USA
    • Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
  • ,
  • James M. Bjork

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
  • ,
  • F.Gerard Moeller

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
  • ,
  • Donald M. Dougherty

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA

Received 20 August 2001; received in revised form 15 November 2001; accepted 19 November 2001.

Abstract 

Background: Impulsivity is prominent in psychiatric disorders. Two dominant models of impulsivity are the reward-discounting model, where impulsivity is defined as inability to wait for a larger reward, and the rapid-response model, where impulsivity is defined as responding without adequate assessment of context. We have compared the role of these models of impulsivity in human psychopathology, based on the hypothesis that rapid-response impulsivity would be more strongly related to other aspects of psychopathology and to impulsivity as described by questionnaires.

Methods: We investigated relationships between personality and laboratory measures of impulsivity, and between these measures and clinical characteristics, in parents of adolescent subjects with disruptive behavioral disorders (DBDs) and matched control subjects. Diagnoses were rendered using the Structured Interview for DSM-IV. The Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) was used as a trait measure of impulsivity. Rapid-response impulsivity was assessed using a form of the Continuous Performance Test, the Immediate Memory-Delayed Memory Task (IMT/DMT). Reward-delay impulsivity was measured using two tasks where subjects could choose between smaller immediate or larger delayed rewards.

Results: Rapid-response, but not reward-delay impulsivity, was significantly higher in subjects with lifetime Axis I or Axis II diagnoses. Scores on the BIS were elevated in subjects with Axis I diagnoses and correlated significantly with both rapid-response and reward-delay tests, but more strongly with the former. Multiple regression showed that rapid-response, but not reward-delay performance or intelligence quotient, contributed significantly to BIS scores. Correlations were similar in parents of control subjects and of DBD subjects.

Conclusions: These data suggest that measures of rapid-response impulsivity and of reward-delay impulsivity are both related to impulsivity as a personality characteristic. The relationship appears stronger, however, for rapid-response impulsivity, as measured by the IMT/DMT. Laboratory and personality measures of impulsivity appear to be related to risk of psychopathology.

Keywords:  Impulsivity, impulse control disorders, personality, assessment

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0006-3223(01)01357-9

Biological Psychiatry
Volume 51, Issue 12 , Pages 988-994, 15 June 2002